Breakout Comparison - ARO vs CRM

To help determine the probability of BO follow through, focus on these two key areas: 1) daily chart setup, and 2) intra-day price action around the opening range or BO.

Here are key comparisons between ARO and CRM on 6/3/2010:
From the daily charts below, both had notable daily patterns with BOs on 6/3. ARO had pulled back to form a symmetric triangle, but it was below key price pivots and below its declining 50 day MA. The CRM setup was much better technically. CRM formed a B&B above its upsloping 50 day MA. In general, a flat-top B&B in a strong uptrend is more powerful than a symmetric triangle below recent price highs. From a daily comparison, CRM carries the higher probability of follow through.


On the 15min charts below, I marked several features: 1) range/volatility of the 15min OR bars, 2) proximity of the first pullback to the 15min 5EMA, and 3) proximity of the BO level to the 5EMA. While both gapped up on the open and both had upper wicks on the OR bar, ARO was much more volatile and moved "too far too fast". CRM moved up and had an orderly pullback to the 5EMA while ARO remainded well above the 5EMA. The BO level in ARO was well extended and above "loose" price action. The BO level in CRM was much closer to the 5EMA and associated with "tight" price action. From an intraday perspective, CRM gets the nod. The result was that CRM trended up all day while ARO spent the remainder of the day consolidating the volatile OR action.